Grant Gross
Senior Writer

VeriSign sues ICANN over delay in services

news
Feb 26, 20043 mins

Lawsuit accuses ICANN of overstepping its authority in contracts with VeriSign

WASHINGTON – VeriSign Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Thursday, accusing the organization of overstepping its contractual authority and improperly attempting to regulate VeriSign’s business.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, seeks an undetermined amount of damages from ICANN, the nonprofit corporation responsible for allocating Internet Protocol address space and managing top-level domains. VeriSign is also asking the court for an injunction to force ICANN to adhere to its contact with VeriSign.

VeriSign alleges that ICANN, by straying from its charter and agreement to be a technical coordination body, has improperly attempted to become the “de facto regulator of the domain name system and in doing so stifled the introduction of new services that benefit Internet users and promote the growth of the Internet,” according to a VeriSign announcement. VeriSign accuses ICANN of overstepping its authority in contracts with VeriSign and the U.S. Department of Commerce to delay VeriSign from offering new Internet services not related to ICANN’s mission.

VeriSign accuses ICANN of dragging its feet on allowing VeriSign to offer new services such as a wait list service, essentially a waiting list for expired domain names, and internationalized domain names, which are domain names in non-English characters, said a VeriSign spokesman. VeriSign also objects to ICANN objections forcing the company to take down its Site Finder Internet search service, said Tom Galvin, vice president of government relations for VeriSign.

“At the heart of the lawsuit is a contract dispute between two corporations,” Galvin said. “ICANN’s ambition has exceeded its authority.”

An ICANN spokesman said Thursday the organization had just heard of the lawsuit. He didn’t have an immediate comment.

VeriSign does not want to end the role of ICANN, just define a clear and credible mission for the organization, Galvin said. “There’s a lot of ambiguity for ICANN about what their role is, and complete ambiguity about offering new services,” he added. “Working the ICANN process is like being nibbled to death by a duck. It makes no sense, and in the end, you’re dead in the water.”

The VeriSign lawsuit seeks to define the process for introducing new Internet-related services, Galvin said. Companies like VeriSign need clarity on the process so that they can decide whether to invest more money in the Internet, he added. “While this is a simple contact dispute, there’s a lot at stake here about innovation,” he said.

Grant Gross

Grant Gross, a senior writer at CIO, is a long-time IT journalist who has focused on AI, enterprise technology, and tech policy. He previously served as Washington, D.C., correspondent and later senior editor at IDG News Service. Earlier in his career, he was managing editor at Linux.com and news editor at tech careers site Techies.com. As a tech policy expert, he has appeared on C-SPAN and the giant NTN24 Spanish-language cable news network. In the distant past, he worked as a reporter and editor at newspapers in Minnesota and the Dakotas. A finalist for Best Range of Work by a Single Author for both the Eddie Awards and the Neal Awards, Grant was recently recognized with an ASBPE Regional Silver award for his article “Agentic AI: Decisive, operational AI arrives in business.”

More from this author