Microsoft faces class-action lawsuit for touting “junk” PCs as “Vista-capable”

As of last Friday, a class-action lawsuit against the company is moving forward, according to The Associated Press. The company is being accused of, during the ’06 holiday season, slapping “Windows Vista Capable” stickers on PCs that would only be capable of running the most rudimentary version of the then-forthcoming OS, Vista Home Basic.

The lawsuit was filed last April in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The original suit noted that “the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million and that the size of the class likely exceeds 10,000 people,” according to the IDG News Service.

In Friday’s ruling, U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman certified the class action suit but whittled down the scope of the original version “to focus primarily on whether Microsoft’s ‘Vista Capable’ labels created artificial demand for computers during the 2006 holiday shopping season, and inflated prices for computers that couldn’t be upgraded to the full-featured version of Vista, which was released at the end of January 2007,” The Associated Press reports.

The Home Basic edition of the OS certainly doesn’t deliver the Vista experience users were likely anticipating. For starters, it’s incapable of running Aero, Vista’s flashy UI. In fact, if you take a look at Microsoft’s comparison of the different flavors of Vista, you’ll see that this low-end variant of the OS can’t do much of anything.

Unfortunately for Microsoft, some of the most damning testimony against its alleged practice comes from within the company itself, according to Computerworld: “An unnamed employee wrote in an e-mail, for example, ‘Even a piece of junk will qualify’ to be called Windows Vista Capable. And Mike Nash, now a corporate vice president for Windows product management, wrote in an email message, ‘I PERSONALLY got burnt…Are we seeing this from a lot of customers?…I now have a $2,100 e-mail machine.'”

As of Friday, Microsoft was still reviewing the judge’s ruling. Back in April, however, Microsoft spokesperson Jack Evans defended the company’s actions saying that Microsoft “conducted a broad effort to educate computer manufacturers, retailers, and consumers about the hardware requirements to run different versions of Windows Vista,” according to the IDG News Service.

Whether or not Microsoft successfully fights the lawsuit, the whole case exemplifies to me just how much of a power-hog Vista is compared to XP. Machines released in late 2006, emblazoned with “Windows Vista Capable” stickers, lack the resources to run a useful version of the OS. On top of that, hardware vendors such as HP and Dell found it challenging — if not impossible — to build machines that complied with the Energy Star 4.0 specification and ran Vista well (i.e. beyond the bare minimum capabilities of Home Basic).

Beyond the impact this stunt has on customers’ bank accounts, it certainly doesn’t have eco-friendly ramifications. End-users who bought those machines and still want to run Vista will either have to upgrade their hardware themselves or, more likely, purchase new, more powerful machines. Either approach is pretty wasteful. And I can’t help but wonder just how many otherwise useful machines we’ll see retired before their time if Microsoft moves forward with its plans to prematurely pull the plug on XP and foist Vista on customers?