by Ed Foster

Reader Voices: The WGA Blues

analysis
Aug 25, 20065 mins

Our on-going discussion about problems with Microsoft's Windows Genuine Advantage program has revealed many readers to be in a sour mood. But the focus of their frustration actually seems not so much Microsoft as it is customers who only complain about what Redmond is up to rather than finding an alternative. "Microsoft has their business plan in place, and they are executing it brilliantly," wrote one reader. "

Our on-going discussion about problems with Microsoft’s Windows Genuine Advantage program has revealed many readers to be in a sour mood. But the focus of their frustration actually seems not so much Microsoft as it is customers who only complain about what Redmond is up to rather than finding an alternative.

“Microsoft has their business plan in place, and they are executing it brilliantly,” wrote one reader. “They are one of the largest and most successful companies in the United States. There may have been a time when Microsoft had a monopoly, but that is certainly not true today. If your business plan does not match up with Microsoft’s, for heaven’s sake, stop doing business with them. There are all kinds of choices: For server software, Novell has file and print services, directory services, and other products that would knock your socks off if you took a couple of days to look at them rather than spending time dealing with the WGA issues. Linux offers magnificent server products, and they are generally no or low cost. For the desktop, Apple has some terrific products, and Linux is really getting very friendly for non-techies to use; have you seriously given Ubuntu a look? It is really quite nice, and very easy to install. At least give something besides Microsoft a try. Intuitive is whatever you are used to. If all you ever deal with is Microsoft products, how will you know what else is out there, and just how easy it is to work with? Do not expect a VERY successful company to change their business model to match yours, however. Right now Microsoft is apparently succeeding in increasing profits by spending all their efforts in fighting what they call piracy. They seem to be willing to sacrifice some customer satisfaction in order to meet their goal. Microsoft is not going to change until the market drives them to change.”

Another reader suggests that the best target for customer ire over WGA is the computer vendors. “If my license of Windows is judged by Microsoft as invalid, then the entity that I bought the computer from has committed fraud on me and theft from Microsoft, plain and simple. What the supplier claims in their defense makes no difference, regardless of who they are. The real target ought to be the suppliers and they ought to be sued for this over and over again until they learn their lesson. It may be possible that Microsoft has made an error in declaring a valid license as invalid, but that is not MY problem. If we go against the suppliers, they will have to battle Microsoft, not us. If I buy a computer from CompUSA or Hewlett-Packard or Dell or PC Club or anyone else that has a fraudulent Windows license associated with it, then because the amount of theft from me is over $100, I can lodge a complaint with my local police department and my state attorney general. If enough of us do this, especially in the larger metropolitan areas, those complaints add up and put pressure on local law enforcement to go against these slugs. The pressure on the local store managers from local law enforcement ought to mount up to something worthwhile. This non-valid license nonsense needs to be nipped right at the bud.”

Some readers think a lot is riding on how people respond to the WGA fiasco. “Within the next year or so, the Western world will make a big decision, one which may even determine whether it remains the main innovative power or passes the torch to the Far East,” another reader wrote. “We have seen here many people having increasing difficulty managing Microsoft’s complex extortion regime — er, protection racket, no, I mean licensing system — and their various XP and W2K boxen. A lot of them are not just grumbling, but committing to switch to Linux and other open source. The decision we’ll have collectively made will be readable in 2008 or thereabouts by doing a census of computers and seeing what percentage now run Linux, versus Vista. The decision whether to break the grip of proprietary operating systems will have been made then. With Vista no doubt to be ratcheted tighter with every service pack, there will be no escaping lock-in — all your data are belong to Microsoft if you go that route. You won’t be able to get your documents into OpenOffice or whatever. If enough of the Western economy changes to being based on Vista computers, MS will be able to hold the whole western hemisphere hostage at any time. They will be the defacto rulers, along with their pals in Hollywood and the RIAA and various other cartels of big businesses. And there will be no escape. There are plenty of allegories in myth; the One Ring to bind them all, the number of the beast without which you cannot buy or sell, etc. Or, we can collectively choose freedom, and migrate our important data to open formats while we still can, before gratuitous DRM features and the DMCA make it illegal to do so.”

Read and post comments about this story here.