Paul Krill
Editor at Large

(Microsoft) Office Space

news
Feb 10, 20052 mins

Microsoft in the past week has been pushing its Office apps suite and Visual Studio as keys to its apps development arsenal, even hailing PC clients at a time when browser-based systems have been stealing the thunder.

Pitching Office as a development platform, company officials are heralding the abilities of the popular desktop suite, leveraging XML.

The proposed Indigo Web services technology also has been at center stage. Offering capabilities for reducing coding and linking to multiple systems, Indigo sounds like a technology that will draw a crowd whenever it arrives. General availability is set for next year.

The bottom line with Indigo, though, is you still need Windows to make it work. This is unlike Sun Microsystems’s strategy involving Java, in which the company has let it be deployed on multiple platforms.

Office also runs primarily on Windows. (OK, there is a Macintosh version, too.)

It seems to me that Microsoft is just continuing its Windows World strategy to maintain desktop dominance while accommodating interoperability with other platforms. With the market reach Microsoft has, it does seem like a reasonable plan, even if open source advocates and companies like Sun are offering alternatives to Windows hegemony.

Still, I wonder how long the a Windows-centric strategy can last as a longterm vision and whether open source alternatives can give Microsoft a run for its money.

Vindication: Recently, I wrote an entry noting that the preponderance of acronyms with multiple definitions has rendered them ineffective in providing a concise way to label techologies. Well, last week I witnessed an example of this involving who else but Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, during a Webcast.

During a question and answer period, an audience member referred to BPM, which prompted Gates to ask, “I assume you mean Business Process Modeling?” But the questioner replied that he meant Business Process Management. So if even the co-founder of Microsoft himself needs clarification, how can the rest of us be expected to navigate these acronyms?

Paul Krill

Paul Krill is editor at large at InfoWorld. Paul has been covering computer technology as a news and feature reporter for more than 35 years, including 30 years at InfoWorld. He has specialized in coverage of software development tools and technologies since the 1990s, and he continues to lead InfoWorld’s news coverage of software development platforms including Java and .NET and programming languages including JavaScript, TypeScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, and Go. Long trusted as a reporter who prioritizes accuracy, integrity, and the best interests of readers, Paul is sought out by technology companies and industry organizations who want to reach InfoWorld’s audience of software developers and other information technology professionals. Paul has won a “Best Technology News Coverage” award from IDG.

More from this author