Martin Heller
Contributing Writer

Windows 7’s speech recognition is not half bad

analysis
Oct 16, 20092 mins

I turned to it in a pinch and was pleasantly surprised I could use it effectively without special equipment

Last week I had a temporary problem typing. As I was writing to deadline, I was less than pleased by the prospect of being unable to do my work.

Many years ago — I think I was running Windows 98 SE at the time — I had a different problem (incipient carpal tunnel syndrome) that required an extended break from mouse and keyboard use. At that time, the two viable options were from IBM and Dragon; I got a special dictation headset microphone and a copy of Dragon, spent hours training it, and was able to do my work for the next few weeks without aggravating my wrists.

[ Is your PC Windows 7-ready? Find out with InfoWorld’s no-cost OfficeBench 7 and Windows Sentinel PC-monitoring tools. | Read the InfoWorld editors’ Windows 7 Deep Dive 21-page PDF report to prepare for the new Microsoft OS, and get Windows 7 deployment advice for IT admins from InfoWorld’s J. Peter Bruzzese. ]

Dragon is still around, though it was acquired by Nuance. Dragon would’ve been my first choice, but I don’t have a current version of the package and certainly nothing that would run on 64-bit Windows 7.

Second choice? I tried to turn on the speech recognition in Microsoft Word, only to discover that it was dropped between Office 2003 and Office 2007. It was replaced by the speech recognition built into Windows.

I turned that on in Windows 7, not expecting much. I told it to use the general-purpose Blue Snowflake microphone I have on my desktop for recording podcasts and doing Skype calls. Desktop microphones are not usually the best options for speech recognition, but I thought it would be worth a try.

To my delight, the Windows 7 speech recognition worked well with a minimum of training. Was it perfect? No, not at all. But it was good enough to serve the purpose. It does more than I expected, including controlling the desktop, and it built itself an index of my documents in the background to improve recognition of my vocabulary.

I’m back to typing now; however, I won’t hesitate to switch to speech recognition when I need it.

This story, “Windows 7’s speech recognition is not half bad,” was originally published at InfoWorld.com. Follow the latest developments in Windows 7 and in Windows in general at InfoWorld.com.

Martin Heller

Martin Heller is a contributing writer at InfoWorld. Formerly a web and Windows programming consultant, he developed databases, software, and websites from his office in Andover, Massachusetts, from 1986 to 2010. From 2010 to August of 2012, Martin was vice president of technology and education at Alpha Software. From March 2013 to January 2014, he was chairman of Tubifi, maker of a cloud-based video editor, having previously served as CEO.

Martin is the author or co-author of nearly a dozen PC software packages and half a dozen Web applications. He is also the author of several books on Windows programming. As a consultant, Martin has worked with companies of all sizes to design, develop, improve, and/or debug Windows, web, and database applications, and has performed strategic business consulting for high-tech corporations ranging from tiny to Fortune 100 and from local to multinational.

Martin’s specialties include programming languages C++, Python, C#, JavaScript, and SQL, and databases PostgreSQL, MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle Database, Google Cloud Spanner, CockroachDB, MongoDB, Cassandra, and Couchbase. He writes about software development, data management, analytics, AI, and machine learning, contributing technology analyses, explainers, how-to articles, and hands-on reviews of software development tools, data platforms, AI models, machine learning libraries, and much more.

More from this author