The CEO carousel runs rings around IT

analysis
Oct 3, 20125 mins

At one company, the CEOs can't seem to stick around -- and turn one IT pro's upgrade project into a task without end

Bureaucratic nonsense is a surefire way to drive any employee crazy, and IT pros are no exception. This story of changing demands under a variety of CEOs took place at a company where I worked in a previous — and seemingly unproductive — life.

I worked in IT at “Acme Corp.” for a few years. In the grand scheme of things, it wasn’t necessarily a bad job. None of the execs I worked for put IT or IT funding as a high priority, but in the corporate world, that attitude isn’t surprising.

[ More from InfoWorld about the IT profession: 5 dysfunctional IT relationships — and how to repair them. | Follow InfoWorld’s Off the Record on Twitter for tech’s war stories, career takes, and off-the-wall news. | Subscribe to the Off the Record newsletter for your weekly dose of workplace shenanigans. ]

What was curious was the employee turnover rate. Lower-level employees didn’t leave all that often, but the opposite was true for those in the management level. CEOs and other execs came and went at a surprisingly fast rate. Why? Not sure entirely, but one rumor around the office pegged the executive pay at Acme Corp. below that of other companies.

The list of day-to-day frustrations that come from reporting to one person after another was endless. But in the end what pushed me over the edge to find a new job was the changing demands over tech upgrades that all started under “CEO I.”

When I first joined Acme Corp., CEO I had only been with the company for about six months. He told me when I was hired that he wanted the company’s IT infrastructure to be upgraded and kept up to date. At the time, I naively thought this was a good sign that IT was a priority at the company.

I made an inventory of all the dated equipment — a lengthy list — and gave him a cost estimate. He said that the price was too high, but he still wanted to upgrade all the aging equipment. We talked it over and prioritized the needs, and he decided we’d do the upgrade in three phases, starting with the most critical and oldest equipment. I got funding for the first phase and had almost completed it when I heard that CEO I was leaving the company.

CEO II came on board as an interim while the board of directors searched for a permanent CEO. I talked to him about the upgrades CEO I had wanted, and he told me to put phases two and three of the upgrade on hold until a new CEO was found. I quickly finished phase one of the project and waited.

The interim CEO stayed nearly two years before we found an “appropriate” replacement, kicking projects down the road until the permanent CEO was hired.

CEO III came on board. One of the first things he asked me was why our IT infrastructure seemed so archaic, and wasn’t I the person responsible for maintaining it? Why had I not done anything about it?

I told him that, yes, I was responsible for the IT infrastructure and explained about the upgrade plan and that I’d been told to put the project on hold. After a lengthy meeting, he agreed to fund continuation of the project.

Of course, given that it took the company so long to find this CEO, the equipment that was upgraded in the first phase were already nearly three years old. But rather than redo phase one of the upgrade, CEO III directed me to just continue with phase two.

I completed phase two and had another meeting with CEO III to get funding for the last phase of the original project plan. However, he told me that we’d have to wait until the next year’s budget.

The next year arrived, and the economy was terrible. I was told there wasn’t enough money for new equipment. Phase three was put on hold another year.

The following year came, and with it yet another executive change — although this time the search only took six months.

CEO IV arrived, called me in to his office, and talked to me about why our IT infrastructure was so outdated. Surprisingly, his questions were asked in a fact-finding manner, and unlike his predecessors, he didn’t have a blame-the-IT-guy undertone to his voice.

I explained what had happened. He listened and said that the upgrades were a priority, but we’d have to wait for funds to open up. He’d let me know.

I’d spent enough time and energy running on the hamster wheel and getting nowhere, so I found another job. As far as I know, Acme Corp. is still using antiquated equipment and promising the new IT pro that the funding will be available “sometime soon.”

Do you have a tech story to share? Send it to offtherecord@infoworld.com. If we publish it, you’ll receive a $50 American Express gift cheque.

This story, “The CEO carousel runs rings around IT,” was originally published at InfoWorld.com. Read more crazy-but-true stories in the anonymous Off the Record blog at InfoWorld.com. For the latest business technology news, follow InfoWorld.com on Twitter.

infoworld_anonymous

Since 2005, IT pros have shared anonymous tech stories of blunders, blowhard bosses, users, tech challenges, and other memorable experiences. Send your story to offtherecord@infoworld.com, and if we publish it in the Off the Record blog we'll send you a $50 American Express gift card -- and, of course, keep you anonymous. (Note that by submitting a story to InfoWorld, you give InfoWorld Media Group, its affiliates, and licensees the right to republish this material in any medium in any language. You retain the copyright to your work and may also publish it without restriction.)

More from this author